Senior Invictus Games volunteers are speaking out against what they call an unwelcome “distraction” at an event meant to honor wounded veterans. The controversy centers on Prince Harry’s apparent woke political messaging during what should have been a celebration of military service and sacrifice.
“While we remain committed to supporting the veterans and their families, there is growing frustration over how Harry and Meghan have dominated the narrative,” one longtime Invictus Games organizer told reporters in Vancouver.
Let that sink in – actual veterans are calling out the founder of their own games.
The tension escalated when President Donald Trump weighed in on calls to examine Harry’s immigration status, delivering a characteristic response that sent shockwaves through both conservative and royal-watching circles. And let’s be honest, when has Trump ever minced words?Ft
“I don’t want to do that,” Trump said regarding potential deportation. “I’ll leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife. She’s terrible.”
Veterans Voice Growing Concerns
The criticism from within Invictus itself carries particular weight. One senior volunteer, involved since 2022, didn’t mince words about the impact on the Games’ core mission.
“They have become a distraction, overshadowing the veterans who should be at the centre of it all,” the insider revealed. “Unlike them, veterans and their families do not see themselves as victims. Their ‘woke’ agenda dies with veterans.”
Multiple sources confirmed that Harry’s opening ceremony speech, which referenced “weak moral character in the world,” was viewed by many as a jab at Trump. This was an ill-timed political statement rather than a focus on veteran achievement.
Needless to say, this seeming attack on Trump didn’t sit well with many veterans. At a time when our military heroes deserve center stage, why inject politics?
“Public sentiment, especially among veterans, reflects this frustration – most do not respect how they continuously insert themselves into the spotlight,” the insider continued.
Trump’s Strategic Response
The President’s dismissal of deportation calls comes amid increased scrutiny of Harry’s visa status following drug use admissions in his memoir “Spare.” Whatever happened to equal application of the law? The Heritage Foundation’s lawsuit seeking those records remains active.
Conservative experts note Trump’s careful handling of the situation reflects broader respect for the working royal family.
“Trump speaks highly and values our monarchy,” explains royal expert Helena Chard. “For this reason, he is giving poor hoodwinked Harry a right to stay in the US.”
At a time when border security dominates headlines, shouldn’t everyone play by the same rules? The controversy highlights a growing divide between traditional military support and celebrity activism. Royal watchers suggest Harry would be better served focusing solely on veteran support rather than political commentary.
“If they had left the royal family, but been quiet about royal matters, their profile would, in my view, be far more favorable,” noted royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams, pointing to the contrast between Harry’s current approach and his earlier military service.
The Heritage Foundation maintains that equal application of immigration law must apply regardless of status. Their 2024 lawsuit argues Harry may have received preferential treatment regarding his visa application – a particularly relevant concern as President Trump’s administration tackles immigration reform.
A Return to Core Values
Veterans advocates emphasize that the Invictus Games’ mission transcends celebrity dynamics. The competition, founded by Harry in 2014, was inspired by the U.S. Armed Forces’ Warrior Games and designed to support recovery and rehabilitation.
“Harry’s best work is the Invictus Games,” acknowledged Chard. “This project is well respected and celebrated.”
However, she added that the prince “should go it alone on occasion” to maintain focus on the veterans.
As the 2025 Games continue in Vancouver, the contrast between their noble mission and the surrounding political drama serves as a reminder of what matters most – supporting those who served. For many veterans, that mission remains clear, even if recent headlines suggest otherwise.
Key Takeaways
- Invictus Games veterans reject Harry’s attempt to inject politics into an event honoring military service.
- President Trump’s strategic restraint on deportation reflects broader respect for working royals.
- The Heritage Foundation’s lawsuit highlights concerns about equal application of immigration law.
- Veterans emphasize mission over celebrity, calling for return to core military values.
Sources: Daily Mail, Fox News
